Showing posts with label Christian Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christian Ethics. Show all posts

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Book Review: At the Altar of Sexual Idolatry, by Steve Gallagher

This book is relatively good in the way it approaches the ethics of sexual addiction. Gallagher identifies the types of attitudes and behaviors that lead to sexual sin, as well as those which keep sexual addicts from experiencing freedom. Gallagher also does a good job of describing the problem of sexual sin. He explains the important internal and external factors that lead to sexual sin. He also describes some of the negative consequences experienced by sexual addicts.

The primary thing I’ve found lacking in the book is a connection to the gospel. Over the course of the book Gallagher indicates that the addict should confess his sin, be mentored by someone who can provide godly instruction, note the consequences that come to sexual addicts, learn to deny selfish desires, stop making excuses, stop blaming others, become desperate for change, cry out to the Lord, develop new habits, separate from the world, realize there is a spiritual battle going on, put on the armor of God, follow Christ’s example, repent, receive God’s discipline, spend time in prayer and God’s Word, avoid atmospheres that provoke lust, cultivate gratitude, repent from complaining, give, serve others, pray for others, fulfill the needs of others, and love their wives. Yet you’ll notice that these are all imperatives—law without gospel.

Now, to be fair, there are a few glimpses of the gospel. In the chapter on repentance, Gallagher indicates that the sexual addict must come to a place of realizing that he is unable to overcome sin apart from God. Yet Gallagher doesn’t tie this explicitly to what God has done in Christ’s redemptive work. Moreover, this is a relatively short section of the book. The cross actually isn’t even mentioned until the last chapter of the book. Gallagher mentions the atonement as payment for the penalty of sin (although his point here is simply that this doesn’t mean that God’s law is no longer relevant). He does then go on to explain that God’s grace saves not only from eternal condemnation, but also from bondage to sin. This gets close, but he doesn’t really explain specifically how God’s grace sets sinners free or how Christ’s life death and resurrection serve as the basis for that freedom from sin.

As we deal with sin, sexual or otherwise, we must keep the gospel central. The message of the gospel strips away my doomed self-righteous attempts to fulfill the law. The knowledge that God no longer counts my sin against me provides me with the freedom to openly acknowledge my sin before Him. The redemptive work of Christ revealed in the message of the gospel empowers me to put the sin in my life to death. But these resources are not made available to the Christian in Gallagher’s book due to the lack of connection to the life-changing gospel. Tragically, this seems to be an all too common trend in current evangelical literature and preaching.*

_________________________

*For a thorough explanation of this problem, see Christless Christianity, by Michael Horton.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Should Unmarried Christian Couples Live Together?

In pastoral ministry I’ve encountered several couples who were professing Christians who were also living together outside of marriage. If these couples were involved in the church, they generally recognized that fornication was sin and sought to abstain from sexual intercourse. Perhaps they even slept in separate rooms. But if they abstained from sexual immorality, they would ask, what is the problem with just living together under the same roof?

Here are six reasons why I believe Christian couples who are not married should not live together:

1. Cohabitation provides a context for sexual temptation. In 1 Corinthians 6:18, Paul exhorts his readers to "Flee sexual immorality." He then goes on to explain why abstinence from sexual immorality is so critical. The old saying is true, that often times we Christians seem to want to see how close we can get to the edge of the cliff without falling off. But it is much more prudent to recognize that we are sinful and could potentially fall into sin at any moment. Therefore, we should employ wisdom in our decisions so that we do not find ourselves in situations in which we may be unnecessarily tempted. For this reason it seems to be a wise choice for a Christian couple not cohabitate.

2. Cohabitation further promulgates the idea within our society that sexual intimacy outside of marriage should not be considered immoral. In Scripture, the word "fornication" (a Greek word also translated as "immorality" or "sexual immorality") refers to a kind of sexual immorality that would include sex outside of the marriage covenant. This kind of sexual activity is presented as immoral in a number of biblical passages (1 Cor 6:13; Gal 5:19; Eph 5:13; Col 3:5l; 1 Thess 4:3). This much is obvious. In addition, our cultural context is one in which it is understood that couples who are living together are also sexually active together. Thus, cohabitation sends a message to the watching world that the couple who is cohabitating is sexually active. This, then, further contributes to idea that fornication is normal and is to be expected. The normalizing effect, then, continues to affect observers' consciences in such a way that the observers become increasingly hardened to the idea that fornication is immoral.

3. Cohabitation sends the message to a watching world that Christians are hypocrites. It is widely understood that sex outside of marriage is forbidden within the Christian ethic. Yet because it is understood that couples who cohabitate are sexually active (see above), Christians should be diligent to avoid this kind of situation. When unbelievers observes a Christian couple cohabitating, they inductively reason that this couple is sexually active and, therefore, practicing hypocrisy. This, then, contributes to the already prevalent idea that Christians are generally hypocritical.

4. The kind of emotional intimacy that is cultivated between a man and a woman who are romantically involved is to be reserved for married couples. Proverbs 4:23 instructs us to guard our hearts. Yet the depth of emotional attachment that is built when we place ourselves under the same roof with someone for whom we have great affection is the kind of unity which is intended to take place within marriage.

5. Christian couples should follow the leadership of their church in matters in which they are not being asked to commit a sin. In Hebrews 13:17, the author admonishes his readers to look to the leadership of their church. In our day, many Christians have a me-and-my-Bible mentality that neglects what the Bible teaches about the role and authority of church pastors and elders. Given the authority of church leadership, Christian couples should look to church leadership on this issue.

6. The utter folly of the kind of cohabitation about which we would speak in our culture is something that has been recognized over the course of church history. And while Church history is not the final authority on any matter, when Christians have been in nearly unanimous agreement on something over the course of church history, the burden of proof lies with the one who would depart from church tradition. And so in order to adopt a stance which would allow Christian couples to cohabitate, one would have to be able to build a clear argument for it from Scripture.